Case Results

$225 Million

Settlement-Laid the Groundwork for Settlement with ExxonMobil on Behalf of the State of New Jersey

Nagel Rice assists DEP in obtaining $225 million pollution settlement between New Jersey and Exxon Mobil Corp.  The litigation against Exxon was handled by Kanner & Whiteley of New Orleans and Nagel Rice of Roseland.  According to the retainer agreement, they are expected to receive roughly $45 million in fees, on top of reimbursement. For…

Settlement-Laid the Groundwork for Settlement with ExxonMobil on Behalf of the State of New Jersey Read More
$200 Million

Class Action Settlement With Horizon Involving Out-Of-Network Providers. NJ Law Journal 10/25/2010.**

Horizon Agrees To Settle Class Action

$54 Million

Settlements Reached with Credit Card Companies

Nagel Rice led by Diane Sammons settled three class action for $54 million alleging improper marketing and sales practices.  Nagel Rice was appointed co-lead counsel in two class actions and was named to the plaintiff’s steering committee in a third class action.

Class Action Settlement Reached in Flawed Health Plan Reimbursements

November 15, 2013 – Bruce Nagel and Nagel Rice reached a settlement with Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey Inc. that accused the insurer of under-reimbursing health plan subscribers for out-of-network services.  As part of the settlement, Horizon has agreed to stop using a database that produced allegedly flawed calculations. Horizon will stop using the Ingenix…

Class Action Settlement Reached in Flawed Health Plan Reimbursements Read More

Robert Solomon Featured In NJ Law Journal

March 12, 2012 – Robert Solomon was featured in NJ Law Journal for the settlement of a class action lawsuit against Medieval Times. Medieval Measures – Castle-themed dinner theater Medieval Times will pay $525,000 and give out 25,000 free tickets to settle a legal joust. The federal class-action suit, O’Hara v. Medieval Times USA Inc., alleged the Buena…

Robert Solomon Featured In NJ Law Journal Read More
Every case is different and results depend on their specific circumstances. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.