Randee M. Matloff
Areas of Practice
  • Class Actions
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Complex Litigation
Education
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Law – Newark, Newark, New Jersey
    • J.D. – 1981
    • Law Review: Women’s Rights Law Reporter, Articles Editor, 1980 – 1981
  • Rutgers University
    • B.A. – 1978 Honors: 
    • Highest Honors
    • College Honors
    • University Scholar
    • Phi Beta Kappa
    • V.P. Beta Beta Beta (Biological Honor Society)
    • Major: Zoology & Philosophy
Bar Admissions
  • New Jersey, 1981
  • U.S. District Court District of New Jersey, 1981
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit, 1981
Fraternities/Sororities
  • Phi Beta Kappa

Randee Matloff is a partner at Nagel Rice and has 30 years of experience representing clients in complex litigation and appellate practice. She practices in both the state and federal courts and has more than a dozen published decisions to her credit. Randee has successfully handled several class actions, including a trio of landmark ERISA class actions against major health insurers, which established coverage for 4 million individuals for the treatment of eating disorders as well as the recovery of millions of dollars of wrongfully denied benefits. She has also successfully handled sever class actions against Horizon BlueCross BlueShield of New Jersey for out of network coverage. In addition, she litigated a class action in the Southern District of New York arising out of a catastrophic fire on a Ski Train in Kaprun, Austria which resulted in a $16.5 settlement. She has also been involved in litigating small business break-ups, construction litigation, insurance coverage disputes, product liability cases, personal injury matters and disputes arising from trusts and estates. Most recently she was involved in a dispute involving the construction of a trust which was a matter of first impression resolved by the New Jersey Supreme Court. She also second chaired a residential construction case which resulted in a $7 million consumer fraud judgment against the builder.

Randee graduated from Rutgers University with Highest Honors and Rutgers Law School. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa. She is admitted to practice in New Jersey, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit. Randee was chosen to Super Lawyers in 2010, 2011, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

  • McDonough v. Horizon Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. CIV.A. 09-571 SRC, 2014 WL 3396097 (D.N.J. July 9, 2014), aff’d sub nom. McDonough v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, 641 F. App’x 146 (3d Cir. 2015)
  • U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Podes, No. A-1622-14T3, 2016 WL 7369027, at *7 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Dec. 20, 2016)
  • DeVito v. Aetna, 536 F. Supp. 2d 523 (D.N.J. 2008)
  • Beye v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, 568 F.Supp. 2d 556 (D.N.J. 2008)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 224 F.R.D. 543 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
  • Ravin, Sarasohn, Cook, Baumgarten, Fisch & Rosen, P.C. v. Lowenstein Sandler, P.C., 365 N.J. Super. 241 (App. Div. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 2003 WL 22909153 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 220 F.R.D. 195 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 2003 WL 21659368 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 2003 WL 21243021 (2nd Cir. N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 257 F.Supp.2d 717 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 2003 WL 1807148 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria, 257 F.Supp.2d 648 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
  • Couri v. Gardner, 173 N.J. 328 (2002)
  • Reynolds v. Lancaster County Prison, 325 N.J. Super. 298 (App. Div. 1999)
  • Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. v. Marley Industries Corp., 245 A.D.2d 554, 666 N.Y.S.2d 503 (1997)
  • Dawson Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 285 N.J. Super. 137 (App. Div. 1995)
  • National Recovery Systems v. Feltman, 211 N.J. Super. 526 (Law Div. 1986)
  • Gregory Marketing Corp. v. Wakefern Food Corp., 207 N.J. Super. 607 (Law Div. 1985)
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

* This web site constitutes an ADVERTISEMENT. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. For the comparison standards employed by the various lawyer rating companies, please visit superlawyers.com, bestlawyers.com, milliondollaradvocatesforum.com, law.com, avvo.com, and thenationaltriallawyers.org. Prior Results do not guarantee a similar outcome, nor does visiting this website create an attorney client relationship.
Website developed in accordance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1.
If you encounter any issues while using this site, please contact us: 973.618.0400